Abstract
In their study of the NATO Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA), Snee and Pye stated that a new conjurisdictional law was being developed with respect to the right to exercise criminal jurisdiction under status of forces agreements. Their study and most other studies, however, are concerned only with the jurisdictional arrangements under the NATO agreement. If a new law is developing, it will evolve not only from the NATO agreement but also from other less publicized agreements. Therefore, these other agreements must be studied in order to determine if the NATO SOFA is setting a standard for the development of such a law.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
