Abstract
Heterogeneous photocatalytic systems are usually described based on electrochemistry, which the vast majority of interpretations and strategies for optimizing photocatalysts rely on. Charge carrier dynamics are usually in the spotlight, whereas the surface chemistry of the photocatalyst is neglected. This is unjustified, because studies on alcohol photoreforming on metal-decorated rutile single crystals revealed that the electrochemical reaction model is not generally applicable. Hence, many photocatalytic reactions may proceed in a different manner and the thermal chemistry needs to be accounted for. The new mechanism is particularly relevant for reactions in gaseous environments in the absence of solvated ionic species. Here, we compare both mechanisms and highlight their differences and consequences for photocatalysis. Based on alcohol photochemistry, we demonstrate the importance of thermal reactions in photocatalytic mechanisms and the relevance of systematic studies in different environments for a holistic understanding of photocatalysis.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.