Abstract
This essay raises the question of the spectrum of subjects relevant to analysis as a basis for urban planning and design. It suggests (1) examination of professional procedures which may reveal spheres excluded from conventional studies, and (2) experimentation with such new spheres which may clarify their affinity to and influence on planning and urban design. Two workshops which tackled these attempts as connected with Tel Aviv are described. Their conclusions reveal latent values uncomfortable as bases for conventional planning. Following Cassirer's position, the article proposes not to reject those findings, but to develop a multi-faceted critical approach and a variety of background studies for planning and urban design.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
