Abstract

Accurate knowledge of floristic composition is crucial when planning and designing research projects and public policies. In this study, our goal was to assess tree sampling accuracy and to identify sites with higher concentrations of rare tree species, as well as those with the highest tree species richness, in the state of Santa Catarina, Brazil. We determined sampling accuracy using the first-order jackknife and Chao 2 estimators, calculated the number of rare species (singletons and doubletons) and applied sampled-based rarefaction. We found that sample accuracy (estimated vs. observed values) was over 90% for the state as a whole, the best estimates having been obtained for the areas of rain forest (first-order jackknife: 91%; Chao 2: 95%). Of the tree species identified, 16.6% were considered rare in the state and only 4% were found in all forest types. Among the various forest types, semideciduous forests showed the highest proportions of rare tree species. Tree species richness was highest in the rain forests and lowest in the dwarf cloud forests. Our results make an important contribution to the conservation of tree species within one of the hottest biodiversity hotspots in the world.

Highlights

  • Brazil is one of the most biodiverse countries of the world, its vegetation has not been well sampled

  • Rain forests occur in climates with warm temperatures and no dry season (Colombo & Joly 2010), which favors the establishment of a larger set of species than in semideciduous forests (Oliveira-Filho & Fontes 2000)

  • The family with the highest level of species richness was Myrtaceae, which accounted for 19.7% of the species, followed by Fabaceae and Lauraceae

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Brazil is one of the most biodiverse countries of the world, its vegetation has not been well sampled. Of the 696 new records of angiosperms added to the List of Species of the Brazilian Flora between 2010 and 2012 (Lista de Espécies da Flora do Brasil 2012), 237 were for the state of Santa Catarina, compared with only 188 for the entire Amazon region, despite the vast expanse of natural vegetation within the latter This suggests that the estimation of species richness is biased by the greater concentration of research centers and universities in areas that are more developed, resulting in a tendency to collect plant specimens repeatedly from sites previously recognized as having the highest levels of species richness (Ponder et al 2001; Schatz 2002; Hopkins 2007; Sobral & Stehmann 2009).

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call