Abstract
In a principal–agent model, we compare tournament and contract schemes, which are both common methods of inducing effort. We assume that an agent’s type, which was private prior to contracting, becomes public during a tournament due to players’ interactions. We show that first-best effort levels can always be achieved in an efficient tournament scheme (ETS), where each agent can upgrade the prize by paying a fee to the principal. Furthermore, we provide sufficient and necessary conditions for the ETS to generate a higher payoff for the principal than the optimal contract scheme (OCS), with examples under mild conditions. In the absence of performance shocks, we provide a rationale for using a combination of tournaments and contracts in the presence of asymmetric information.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
