Totally laparoscopic versus laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy: the KLASS-07, a randomized controlled trial.

Abstract

Strong evidence is lacking as no confirmatory randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have compared the efficacy of totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (TLDG) with laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG). We performed an RCT to confirm if TLDG is different from LADG. The XXXXX trial is a multicentre, open-label, parallel-group, phase III, RCT of 442 patients with clinical stage I gastric cancer. Patients were enrolled from 21 cancer care centers in South Korea between January 2018 and September 2020 and randomized to undergo TLDG or LADG using blocked randomization with a 1:1 allocation ratio, stratified by the participating investigators. Patients were treated through R0 resections by TLDG or LADG as the full analysis set of the XXXXX trial. The primary endpoint was morbidity within postoperative day 30, and the secondary endpoint was QoL for 1 year. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT XXXXXXXX). 442 patients were randomized (222 to TLDG, 220 to LADG), and 422 patients were included in the pure analysis (213 and 209, respectively). The overall complication rate did not differ between the two groups (TLDG vs. LADG: 12.2% vs. 17.2%). However, TLDG provided less postoperative ileus and pulmonary complications than LADG (0.9% vs. 5.7%, P=0.006; and 0.5% vs. 4.3%, P=0.035, respectively). The QoL was better after TLDG than after LADG regarding emotional functioning at 6 months, pain at 3 months, anxiety at 3 and 6 months, and body image at 3 and 6 months (all P<0.05). However, these QoL differences were resolved at 1 year. The XXXXX trial confirmed that TLDG is not different from LADG in terms of postoperative complication but has advantages to reduce ileus and pulmonary complications. TLDG can be a good option to offer better QoL in terms of pain, body image, emotion, and anxiety at 3-6 months.