Total knee arthroplasty versus unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in management of anteromedial knee osteoarthritis: a randomized clinical trial

Abstract

Background: Both total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) are options to manage anteromedial knee osteoarthritis. This study’s aim was to determine the functional outcome, time taken to walk without support, and postoperative complications after either TKA or UKA in treatment of anteromedial knee osteoarthritis. Methods: A prospective randomized cohort study was performed at a level 1 academic center on 60 patients with a mean age of 56.2 yr who had isolated anteromedial knee osteoarthritis. Thirty patients were managed by UKA (group 1), and the other 30 patients were managed by TKA (group 2). Diagnosis was confirmed by plain radiographs (anteroposterior standing, lateral, skyline, stress varus, and valgus views). Follow-up was done for at least 12 mo postoperatively. Results: Mean preoperative functional Knee Society Score (KSS) was 65.83 and 62.67 for group 1 and group 2, respectively. Mean functional KSS after 1 yr was 86.3 for group 1 and 84.6 for group 2. In group 1, one patient developed lateral joint line pain, and another patient developed postoperative blood loss of more than 400 mL. In group 2, one patient developed patellofemoral pain, and another patient developed postoperative blood loss of more than 400 mL. The mean time that it took for patients to walk without support was 1.6 wk in group 1 and 1.93 wk for group 2. Conclusions: Both UKA and TKA have the same functional outcome for treatment of anteromedial knee osteoarthritis and the same rate of complications, but early postoperative rehabilitation is better in patients managed by UKA. Level of Evidence: Level I.