Abstract
* Revision hip arthroplasty is being performed with increasing frequency in the United States. One of the major challenges during these procedures is addressing associated femoral bone loss.* Varying degrees of proximal metaphyseal and diaphyseal bone loss may be treated with reconstruction techniques involving extensively porous-coated stems, distally based modular stems, and proximal femoral replacement. When diaphyseal bone loss extends beyond the isthmus of the femur with little support for a stem, reconstruction with replacement of the entire femur, hip, and knee (total femoral replacement) may be indicated.* Total femoral replacement is best indicated for older patients with massive loss of bone stock that makes them unsuitable for less-extensive reconstruction methods. The procedure is technically demanding and is associated with a high risk of complications, including major blood loss, deep infection, dislocation, and mechanical implant failure.* In appropriately selected patients, total femoral replacement can provide a successful salvage of an otherwise unreconstructible femur. (Previously, the only options available in such cases were nonoperative treatment, resection arthroplasty, or amputation.) In several case series, total femoral replacement has demonstrated good pain relief and improved function at intermediate to long-term follow-up.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.