Abstract

Feedstock cost is a major variable cost component in conversion to biofuels and chemicals. Consistent feedstock quality is critically important to achieve high product yield and maximum onstream time. Traditionally, raw biomass materials are delivered directly to the biorefineries where they are preprocessed to feedstock prior to being converted to products. Since many types of biomass materials—including agricultural residues, energy crops, and logging residues—are harvested according to growth cycles and optimal harvesting time, just-in-time steady supply of raw biomass to the biorefineries is not possible. Instead, biomass materials are stored, then delivered to the biorefineries as needed. Experience to date indicates that this approach has caused many issues related to logistics, biomass losses due to microbial degradation and fire, and inconsistent feedstock quality due to variability in the properties of as-delivered biomass. These factors have led to high feedstock cost, low throughput, and low product yield for the biorefineries. Idaho National Laboratory has developed a new strategy to address the problems encountered in the traditional approach in biomass feedstock supply, storage, and preprocessing mentioned above. The key components of this strategy are (1) preservation and preconditioning of biomass during storage, (2) utilization of all the biomass, including minor components that are normally considered wastes or contaminants, and (3) maximization of the value of each component. This new approach can be accomplished using feedstock preprocessing depots located near the biomass-production sources.

Highlights

  • This paper focuses primarily on utilization of agricultural residues, corn stover, and herbaceous energy crops

  • The National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) has projected that, to meet the Department of Energy (DOE) fuel selling price target of $2.50/GGE by 2030, the price of biomass feedstock delivered to the reactor throat for a biomass-to-hydrocarbon fuels biochemical conversion facility must be

  • The blending approach is restricted to areas where the low-cost and high-carbohydrate-content biomass materials are available. Another issue with supplying biomass feedstock with highly variable component concentrations is that a biorefinery capable of converting these major components to biofuels and high-value coproducts would be complex and require high capital investment, which is a significant barrier to commercialization, especially for new technologies

Read more

Summary

Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology

Experience to date indicates that this approach has caused many issues related to logistics, biomass losses due to microbial degradation and fire, and inconsistent feedstock quality due to variability in the properties of as-delivered biomass. These factors have led to high feedstock cost, low throughput, and low product yield for the biorefineries. The key components of this strategy are (1) preservation and preconditioning of biomass during storage, (2) utilization of all the biomass, including minor components that are normally considered wastes or contaminants, and (3) maximization of the value of each component This new approach can be accomplished using feedstock preprocessing depots located near the biomass-production sources

INTRODUCTION
BIOMASS SUPPLY AND LOGISTICS
BIOMASS PREPROCESSING AND FRACTIONATION
Chopping Logistics
Waste streams
More consistent properties than baled biomass
PRODUCT APPLICATIONS
Findings
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call