Abstract
"No longer is the decisive question whether the party sued--the defendant--negligently harmed someone. The question now centers on how much the plaintiff ought to be compensated for injuries". "The underlying problem here is not an epidemic of incompetence among doctors. It is an epidemic of grossly unrealistic expectations of what doctors can do--encouraged, unfortunately, by courts which should known better. People have come to believe that doctors should never make mistakes and courts have reinforced this absurd requirement of infallibility by punishing breaches with settlements way out of proportion to actual damages". "Personal-injury awards, especially jury awards, are out of touch with reality. They are often based on estimates of how much money the defendants have rather than whether they are at fault".
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callSimilar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
