Torsional Resistance of WaveOne Gold and Reciproc Blue according to the Loading Methods

Abstract

IntroductionThis study aimed to compare the torsional resistances and fracture modes of WaveOne Gold (Dentsply Sirona, Ballaigues, Switzerland) and Reciproc Blue (VDW, Munich, Germany) using the repetitive torsional loading (RTL) method and the conventional single-rotation (STL) method. MethodsA 3-mm file tip was fixed with a brass plate, and a torsional load was applied using a custom device. In the RTL method, the file was driven counterclockwise at 50 rpm until it achieved the preset torque of 0.5 Ncm; thereafter, it was returned to its original position. This recovery of the file to its original position was defined as 1 torsional loading cycle; the number of repetitive load cycles until fracture was counted. In the STL method, the files were rotated at a constant rate of 2 rpm in a counterclockwise direction until file fracture. The fragments fractured by the 2 methods were compared under a scanning electron microscope to examine the topographic features of the fractured surfaces and longitudinal aspects. ResultsWith the RTL method, Reciproc Blue showed a higher number of repetitive load cycles until fracture than WaveOne Gold (P < .05). With the STL method, Reciproc Blue also had a higher ultimate strength than WaveOne Gold (P < .05). Scanning electron microscopic findings of the fractured specimens from the 2 test methods showed different features of torsional failure. ConclusionsWithin the study limitations, both the RTL and STL methods conferred similar torsional resistance. Therefore, the clinically relevant RTL method with repetitive and reciprocation motion can be used for testing torsional resistance.