Abstract

This study characterizes and compares the physicochemical parameters of three types of biomass: giant miscanthus, wheat straw, and white willow. An analysis of the chlorine content in the biomass was determined using a 5E-FL2350 fluorine and chlorine analyzer. In addition, energy parameters characterizing the biomass were determined, such as the content of ash and volatile matter in the tested materials, using the LECO TGA 701 thermogravimetric analyzer. The carbon and hydrogen contents were tested using the LECO TruSpec CHN elementary organic analyzer. The calorific value was determined using the LECO AC 500 isoperibolic calorimeter. Based on the research results, it was concluded that the use of the biomass torrefaction process improves its energy parameters. In the long term, this will affect the maintenance of the technical and operational efficiency of devices, installations, and power boilers compared to the co-combustion of fresh biomass. The greatest differences in results were recorded in the case of chlorine content. Carrying out detailed tests on the material immediately after its harvest showed that the content of this element was about 70% higher than in the case of torrefied raw material. The presence of chlorine in alternative fuels is responsible for the formation of chloride corrosion. Its content can be up to five times higher compared to conventional energy sources. The degree of risk of chloride corrosion of the selected elements of devices and installations is assessed on the basis of the so-called “chlorine corrosion index”.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call