Abstract

This study was designed to investigate the complex interplay between multisensory processing, top–down processes related to the task relevance of sensory signals, and sensory switching. Thirty-five adults completed either a speeded detection or a discrimination task using the same auditory and visual stimuli and experimental setup. The stimuli consisted of unisensory and multisensory presentations of the letters ‘b’ and ‘d’. The multisensory stimuli were either congruent (e.g., the grapheme ‘b’ with the phoneme /b/) or incongruent (e.g., the grapheme ‘b’ with the phoneme /d/). In the detection task, the participants had to respond to all of the stimuli as rapidly as possible while, in the discrimination task, they only responded on those trials where one prespecified letter (either ‘b’ or ‘d’) was present. Incongruent multisensory stimuli resulted in faster responses as compared to unisensory stimuli in the detection task. In the discrimination task, only the dual-target congruent stimuli resulted in faster RTs, while the incongruent multisensory stimuli led to slower RTs than to unisensory stimuli; RTs were the slowest when the visual (rather than the auditory) signal was irrelevant, thus suggesting visual dominance. Switch costs were also observed when switching between unisensory target stimuli, while dual-target multisensory stimuli were less likely to be affected by sensory switching. Taken together, these findings suggest that multisensory motor enhancements and sensory switch costs are influenced by top–down modulations determined by task instructions, which can override the influence of prior learnt associations.

Highlights

  • Events and objects within the environment change continually, in terms of their relative spatial location and sensory properties, and in terms of their relevance to a given task or situation

  • We demonstrate that multisensory enhancements and switch costs are modulated by prior learning and experience, but by the task relevance of sensory signals as well

  • By contrast, the same incongruent stimuli resulted in the highest reaction time (RT) gains and significantly smaller switch costs suggesting that the specific task relevance of the sensory signals modulated multisensory enhancements and switch costs

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Events and objects within the environment change continually, in terms of their relative spatial location and sensory properties (e.g., a person speaking indoors and outdoors will sound different, yet we have no trouble in recognizing that it is the same person who is speaking), and in terms of their relevance to a given task or situation.

Participants
Results
Discussion
Compliance with ethical standards
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call