Abstract

AbstractAn accurate description of the topside ionosphere is of great importance for space weather applications. Currently, there are two commonly used empirical ionosphere models, that is, NeQuick2 and IRI‐2016, that can be used to describe the topside ionosphere. In this study, topside total electron content (TEC) values derived from low Earth orbit (LEO) satellites are selected to validate the topside ionosphere predictions of the NeQuick2 and IRI‐2016 models from 2008 to 2018. The results show that these two models both underestimate the topside ionosphere. Compared with the global topside ionosphere model estimated by LEO‐based global positioning system (GPS) observations with orbital altitudes of 500 and 800 km, NeQuick2 and IRI‐2016 have similar performances over different latitudes and longitudes. The daily mean root mean square (RMS) values are approximately 4.10 and 2.10 TEC units (TECU) for the region above 500 and 800 km, respectively. The results assessed by the GPS‐TEC technique indicate that the performance of the NeQuick2 model is slightly better than that of the IRI‐2016 model. The daily mean bias mainly ranges from −1.5 to 1.5 and −3.0 to −1.0 TECU for the regions above 500 and 800 km, respectively. The RMS values for the corresponding parts are 3.50 and 2.74 TECU. Finally, the validation results of the dSTEC method show that the mean bias is −0.43 and −0.20 TECU above 500 and 800 km, respectively. The mean RMS values are 2.04 and 0.72 TECU for the corresponding regions.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call