Abstract

Phase-amplitude coupling (PAC), a type of cross-frequency coupling (CFC) where the phase of a low-frequency rhythm modulates the amplitude of a higher frequency, is becoming an important indicator of information transmission in the brain. However, the neurobiological mechanisms underlying its generation remain undetermined. A realistic, yet tractable computational model of the phenomenon is thus needed. Here we analyze a neural mass model of a cortical column, comprising fourteen neuronal populations distributed across four layers (L2/3, L4, L5 and L6). A control analysis showed that the conditional transfer entropy (cTE) measure is able to correctly estimate the flow of information between neuronal populations. Then, we computed cTE from the phases to the amplitudes of the oscillations generated in the cortical column. This approach provides information regarding directionality by distinguishing PAC from APC (amplitude-phase coupling), i.e. the information transfer from amplitudes to phases, and can be used to estimate other types of CFC such as amplitude-amplitude coupling (AAC) and phase-phase coupling (PPC). While experiments often only focus on one or two PAC combinations (e.g., theta-gamma or alpha-gamma), we found that a cortical column can simultaneously generate almost all possible PAC combinations, depending on connectivity parameters, time constants, and external inputs. PAC interactions with and without an anatomical equivalent (direct and indirect interactions, respectively) were analyzed. We found that the strength of PAC between two populations was strongly correlated with the strength of the effective connections between the populations and, on average, did not depend on whether the PAC connection was direct or indirect. When considering a cortical column circuit as a complex network, we found that neuronal populations making indirect PAC connections had, on average, higher local clustering coefficient, efficiency, and betweenness centrality than populations making direct connections and populations not involved in PAC connections. This suggests that their interactions were more effective when transmitting information. Since approximately 60% of the obtained interactions represented indirect connections, our results highlight the importance of the topology of cortical circuits for the generation of the PAC phenomenon. Finally, our results demonstrated that indirect PAC interactions can be explained by a cascade of direct CFC and same-frequency band interactions, suggesting that PAC analysis of experimental data should be accompanied by the estimation of other types of frequency interactions for an integrative understanding of the phenomenon.

Highlights

  • It has been hypothesized that phase-amplitude coupling (PAC) of neurophysiological signals plays a role in the shaping of local neuronal oscillations and in the communication between cortical areas [1]

  • Our results highlight the importance of the topology of the cortical column network on the generation of PAC, and show that indirect PAC connections can be predicted by a cascade of direct same-frequency coupling (SFC) and cross-frequency coupling (CFC) connections

  • We demonstrated that indirect PAC connections can be predicted by a cascade of direct CFC and SFC interactions, suggesting that PAC analysis of experimental data should be accompanied by the estimation of other types of interactions for an integrative understanding of the phenomenon

Read more

Summary

Introduction

It has been hypothesized that phase-amplitude coupling (PAC) of neurophysiological signals plays a role in the shaping of local neuronal oscillations and in the communication between cortical areas [1]. Computational models of the theta-gamma PAC generation in the hippocampus have been proposed [3] and are based on two main types of models. The first type of models consists of a network of inhibitory neurons (I-I model) [4], whereas the second model is based on the reciprocal connections between networks of excitatory pyramidal cells and inhibitory neurons (E-I model) [3, 5]. In such models, fast excitation and delayed feedback inhibition alternate, and with appropriate strength of excitation and inhibition, oscillatory behavior occurs. The Wilson and Cowan model consists of excitatory and inhibitory neural populations which are mutually connected

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call