Abstract
AbstractTopology control is the problem of selecting neighbors for each node in a wireless network, so that the resulting network has a number of useful properties. More precisely, a topology control protocol P takes as input a network G and aims to construct a spanning subgraph G P , that is sparse, “energy minimizing” and has sufficient connectivity so as to guarantee multiple short paths between pairs of nodes in G. Currently, topology control protocols assume that nodes in G reside in some Euclidean (usually, 2-dimensional) space and rely on geometric information such as node locations and pairwise distances between nodes to produce G P with appropriate properties. However, these protocols are extremely sensitive to errors in location information and this feature makes them impractical because errors in location and distance information are pervasive in practical systems. This paper presents and analyzes two randomized topology control protocols that are tolerant to errors in pairwise distance estimates. The first protocol, called RTC (short for randomized topology control) uses no geometric information, relying only on connectivity information and is therefore completely immune to errors in location or distance information. The second protocol, called ε-RTC, generalizes the first protocol. Allowing for errors in distance estimates, but assuming that relative errors are bounded above by ε, the second protocol produces an output network that is symmetric, connected, sparse, and has good spanner properties. As \(\varepsilon \longrightarrow 0\), ε-RTC behaves like the XTC protocol (R. Wattenhofer and A. Zollinger, “XTC: A practical topology control algorithm for ad-hoc networks”, WMAN 2004) and for large values of ε, it behaves like RTC. Our results hold whenever the input network is a unit disk graph or even a quasi unit disk graph.KeywordsDistance EstimateOutput NetworkInput GraphDistance InformationTopology ControlThese keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have