Abstract
Many species orient towards specific locations to reach important resources using different cognitive mechanisms. Some of these, such as path integration, are now well understood, but the cognitive orientation mechanisms that underlie movements in non-human primates remain the subject of debate. To investigate whether movements of chacma baboons are more consistent with Euclidean or topological spatial awareness, we investigated whether baboons made repeated use of the same network of pathways and tested three predictions resulting from the hypothesized use of Euclidean and topological spatial awareness. We recorded ranging behaviour of a group of baboons during 234 full days and 137 partial days in the Soutpansberg Mountains, South Africa. Results show that our baboons travelled through a dense network of repeated routes. In navigating this route network, the baboons did not approach travel goals from all directions, but instead approached them from a small number of the same directions, supporting topological spatial awareness. When leaving travel goals, baboons’ initial travel direction was significantly different from the direction to the next travel goal, again supporting topological spatial awareness. Although we found that our baboons travelled with similar linearity in the core area as in the periphery of their home range, this did not provide conclusive evidence for the existence of Euclidean spatial awareness, since the baboons could have accumulated a similar knowledge of the periphery as of the core area. Overall, our findings support the hypothesis that our baboons navigate using a topological map.
Highlights
IntroductionEcology and behaviour, most animals need to orient and navigate towards specific places to reach important resources
Despite diversity in morphology, ecology and behaviour, most animals need to orient and navigate towards specific places to reach important resources
We investigate whether movements of chacma baboons (Papio ursinus) are more consistent with topological or Euclidean spatial awareness
Summary
Ecology and behaviour, most animals need to orient and navigate towards specific places to reach important resources. Animals navigating through large-scale space face a complex environment in which they need to exploit resources. Path integration, where an animal continuously updates its position by integrating all its distances moved and changes of direction, has been reported in a wide variety of taxa (Trapanese et al 2018). The mechanism is not precise and only enables animals to return to a certain start point after a single journey, and to rely on it solely results in navigational errors that become amplified further along the path the animal travels While most animals use path integration in their movements (Etienne et al 1998), they may possess additional spatial cognitive abilities (Trapanese et al 2018)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.