Topological relations between regions in ρ2 and ℤ2

Abstract

Listen

Translate article

Users of geographic databases that integrate spatial data represented in vector and raster models, should not perceive the differences among the data models in which data are represented, nor should they be forced to apply different concepts depending on the model in which spatial data are represented. A crucial aspect of spatial query languages for such integrated systems is the need mechanisms to process queries about spatial relations in a consistent fashion. This paper compares topological relations between spatial objects represented in a continuous (vector) space of ρ2 and a discrete (raster) space of ℤ2. It applies the 9-intersection, a frequently used formalism for topological spatial relations between objects represented in a vector data model, to describe topological relations for bounded objects represented in a raster data model. We found that the set of all possible topological relations between regions in ρ2 is a subset of the topological relations that can be realized between two bounded, extended objects in ℤ2. At a theoretical level, the results contribute toward a better understanding of the differences in the topology of continuous and discrete space. The particular lesson learnt here is that topology in ρ2 is based on coincidence, whereas in ℤ2 it is based on coincidence and neighborhood. The relevant differences between the raster and the vector model are that an object's boundary in ℤ2 has an extent, while it has none in ρ2; and in the finite space of ℤ2 there are points between which one cannot insert another one, while in the infinite space of ρ2 between any two points there exists another one.KeywordsSpatial ObjectTopological RelationTopology DistanceVector RegionConceptual NeighborhoodThese keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.