Abstract

Abstract. Boreal forest soils are globally an important sink for methane (CH4), while these soils are also capable of emitting CH4 under favourable conditions. Soil wetness is a well-known driver of CH4 flux, and the wetness can be estimated with several terrain indices developed for the purpose. The aim of this study was to quantify the spatial variability of the forest floor CH4 flux with a topography-based upscaling method connecting the flux with its driving factors. We conducted spatially extensive forest floor CH4 flux and soil moisture measurements, complemented by ground vegetation classification, in a boreal pine forest. We then modelled the soil moisture with a random forest model using digital-elevation-model-derived topographic indices, based on which we upscaled the forest floor CH4 flux. The modelling was performed for two seasons: May–July and August–October. Additionally, we evaluated the number of flux measurement points needed to get an accurate estimate of the flux at the whole study site merely by averaging. Our results demonstrate high spatial heterogeneity in the forest floor CH4 flux resulting from the soil moisture variability as well as from the related ground vegetation. The mean measured CH4 flux at the sample points was −5.07 µmol m−2 h−1 in May–July and −8.67 µmol m−2 h−1 in August–October, while the modelled flux for the whole area was −7.42 and −9.91 µmol m−2 h−1 for the two seasons, respectively. The spatial variability in the soil moisture and consequently in the CH4 flux was higher in the early summer (modelled range from −12.3 to 6.19 µmol m−2 h−1) compared to the autumn period (range from −14.6 to −2.12 µmol m−2 h−1), and overall the CH4 uptake rate was higher in autumn compared to early summer. In the early summer there were patches emitting high amounts of CH4; however, these wet patches got drier and smaller in size towards the autumn, changing their dynamics to CH4 uptake. The mean values of the measured and modelled CH4 fluxes for the sample point locations were similar, indicating that the model was able to reproduce the results. For the whole site, upscaling predicted stronger CH4 uptake compared to simply averaging over the sample points. The results highlight the small-scale spatial variability of the boreal forest floor CH4 flux and the importance of soil chamber placement in order to obtain spatially representative CH4 flux results. To predict the CH4 fluxes over large areas more reliably, the locations of the sample points should be selected based on the spatial variability of the driving parameters, in addition to linking the measured fluxes with the parameters.

Highlights

  • Methane (CH4) is an important and strong greenhouse gas, of which the largest natural source to the atmosphere is wetlands (Kirschke et al, 2013; Saunois et al, 2016)

  • The most common vascular species growing in the sample points were V. vitis-idaea (48 out of 54 studied sample points), V. myrtillus (45 points), Equisetum sylvaticum, and L. borealis, followed by M. bifolium and T. europaea

  • (1) The Sphagnum group included 15 sample points that had over 50 % Sphagnum coverage and no P. schreberi

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Methane (CH4) is an important and strong greenhouse gas, of which the largest natural source to the atmosphere is wetlands (Kirschke et al, 2013; Saunois et al, 2016). E. Vainio et al.: Spatial variability in forest floor methane flux the largest natural CH4 sink, boreal upland forests are considered to be a globally important terrestrial sink due to soil CH4 oxidation by methanotrophs (Kirschke et al, 2013; Saunois et al, 2016). The sink role of upland forests is well in agreement with the current paradigm, where methanotrophy only occurs in oxic conditions, while methanogenesis requires anoxic conditions. CH4-producing methanogens are found to be universal in well-drained upland soils (Angel et al, 2012), which is linked to the findings that methanogenesis can occur in anaerobic microenvironments within oxic soils (Angel et al, 2011; Angel et al, 2017)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call