Abstract
AbstractThe Topographic Wetness Index (TWI) is a commonly used proxy for soil moisture. The predictive capability of TWI is influenced by the flow‐routing algorithm and the resolution of the Digital Elevation Model (DEM) that TWI is derived from. Here, we examine the predictive capability of TWI using 11 flow‐routing algorithms at DEM resolutions 1–30 m. We analyze the relationship between TWI and field‐quantified soil moisture using statistical modeling methods and 5,200 study plots with over 46 000 soil moisture measurements. In addition, we test the sensitivity of the flow‐routing algorithms against vertical height errors in DEM at different resolutions. The results reveal that the overall predictive capability of TWI was modest. The highest r2 (23.7%) was reached using a multiple‐flow‐direction algorithm at 2 m resolution. In addition, the test of sensitivity against height errors revealed that the multiple‐flow‐direction algorithms were also more robust against DEM errors than single‐flow‐direction algorithms. The results provide field‐evidence indicating that at its best TWI is a modest proxy for soil moisture and its predictive capability is influenced by the flow‐routing algorithm and DEM resolution. Thus, we encourage careful evaluation of algorithms and resolutions when using TWI as a proxy for soil moisture.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
