Abstract
Our visual system readily groups dynamic fragmented input into global objects. How the brain represents global object perception remains however unclear. To address this question, we recorded brain responses using functional magnetic resonance imaging whilst observers viewed a dynamic bistable stimulus that could either be perceived globally (i.e., as a grouped and coherently moving shape) or locally (i.e., as ungrouped and incoherently moving elements). We further estimated population receptive fields and used these to back-project the brain activity measured during stimulus perception into visual space via a searchlight procedure. Global perception resulted in universal suppression of responses in lower visual cortex accompanied by wide-spread enhancement in higher object-sensitive cortex. However, follow-up experiments indicated that higher object-sensitive cortex is suppressed if global perception lacks shape grouping, and that grouping-related suppression can be diffusely confined to stimulated sites and accompanied by background enhancement once stimulus size is reduced. These results speak to a non-generic involvement of higher object-sensitive cortex in perceptual grouping and point to an enhancement-suppression mechanism mediating the perception of figure and ground.
Highlights
Perceptual grouping binds together local image elements into global and coherent objects and segregates them from other objects in our visual field including the background (Roelfsema, 2006; Roelfsema and Houtkamp, 2011)
When comparing the diamond or nodiamond percept to fixation, activity increased in the area within which the visible diamond segments moved. This pattern was fairly focal in V1 with suppressed differential activity in non-stimulated sites, but became more diffuse in V2, V3, and the ventral-and-lateral occipital complex (VLOC)
We found evidence for a suppression of activity in lower visual cortex accompanied by an increase of activity in the VLOC for global relative to local object perception
Summary
Perceptual grouping binds together local image elements into global and coherent objects and segregates them from other objects in our visual field including the background (Roelfsema, 2006; Roelfsema and Houtkamp, 2011). V1 and V4 responses to elements grouped into contours are enhanced, whereas those to ungrouped background elements are suppressed (Chen et al, 2014; Gilad et al, 2013) Taken together, these findings indicate that the monkey visual system draws upon a response amplitude code to mediate figure-ground segregation. The functional relevance of such signatures and whether they are mediated by feedback, feedforward, or lateral connections or a combination thereof, remains a matter of active debate and research (e.g., de-Wit et al, 2012; Poort et al, 2016, 2012)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.