Abstract
PurposeTo compare topographic, pachymetric and epithelial distribution patterns of clinically unaffected fellow eyes of patients with asymmetric keratoconus (AKC) with those of normal controls and keratoconic fellow eyes. MethodsA prospective, observational study was conducted at a tertiary care center, in which twenty-five clinically unaffected fellow eyes in patients with AKC were compared to 25 keratoconic fellow eyes and 67 normal controls. Pachymetric and epithelial thicknesses in the central 2 mm and 8 octants in the 2–5 mm and 5–7 mm zones were compared using Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SDOCT). Scheimpflug derived topography was also compared. ResultsMean simulated keratometry of fellow eyes (43.6D ± 1.34 D) was comparable to that of control eyes (43.85D ± 1.57 D) (p > 0.99) and less than that of keratoconic eyes (47.08D ± 4.62 D) (p = 0.004). Central corneal and epithelial thicknesses of fellow eyes (474.28 ± 40.27 μm, 52.76 ± 7.45 μm, respectively) were less than in control eyes (505.97 ± 30.12 μm, 60.48 ± 8.37 μm) (p < 0.001 and p = 0.006, respectively) but comparable to those of keratoconic eyes (470.48 ± 44.19 μm, 52.48 ± 8.00 μm) (p > 0.99). Pachymetric differences of radially opposite octants in the 2–5 mm zone demonstrated thinning in the inferior and inferotemporal octants of fellow eyes which was greater than that seen in control eyes (p = 0.017 and 0.04, respectively) ConclusionReduced central epithelial thickness and greater pachymetric differences in radially opposite octants of the mid-peripheral cornea may be suggestive of susceptibility to ectasia despite normal topography.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.