Abstract
Real-time kinematic (RTK) global positioning system (GPS) receivers are being marketed for applications where accurate estimates of elevation are required. Because this technology is fairly expensive, the quality of these data should be considered with respect to that of USGS digital elevation DEMs (digital elevation models) that are freely available for most of the United States at the 30-m grid scale and for some areas on 10-m grids. The objective of this study was to compare terrain attributes calculated from USGS DEMs with those calculated from DEMs developed with precision RTK GPS measurements. At two locations in central Kentucky, intensive elevation measurements were collected with RTK GPS. The USGS and RTK data for these areas were interpolated to create 4-m DEMs for comparing terrain attributes. Correlations between the attributes developed from different DEMs were substantially larger for slope and aspect than for curvature, topographic wetness index, and stream power index values. Although there were large quantitative differences in terrain attribute values, the general spatial patterns were similar for the attributes calculated from the RTK and USGS DEMs. However, landscape features defined using DEMs developed with RTK data were more similar to those observed with 10- than 30-m USGS DEMs. For some course-scale applications, 30-m USGS DEMs may be adequate for identifying important landscape characteristics. However, the resolution of many of these features will be substantially better with 10-m USGS DEMs. However, quantitative estimates of terrain attributes at a specific location may be grossly incorrect. For situations where accuracy is essential, precision elevation surveys will be required.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.