Abstract

Two studies were conducted to extend the Theory of Integrated Domains in Epistemology framework (TIDE; Muis, Bendixen, & Haerle, 2006) with regard to the level of topic-specificity and to empirically test crucial aspects of this extension. In Study 1, 212 student teachers were surveyed on their general and topic-specific absolute beliefs regarding eleven topics. Topic familiarity and students’ teaching subjects were investigated as person-specific context factors. In Study 2, domain-specific and topic-specific multiplistic beliefs of 365 student teachers were investigated. The topic-specific context was experimentally manipulated; Students were presented with four texts on educational research whose content (invariant over the conditions) allegedly originated from a layperson, an expert, or a scientist. The results provide evidence for the assumption of a reciprocal influence between topic-specific and more general epistemic beliefs. Furthermore, we found substantial effects of topic-related contextual factors on topic-specific epistemic beliefs. Implications for theory and suggestions for future empirical research are discussed.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.