Abstract
Let S be a transformation semigroup acting on a set Ω. The action of S on Ω can be naturally extended to be an action on all subsets of Ω. We say that S is ℓ-homogeneous provided it can send A to B for any two (not necessarily distinct) ℓ-subsets A and B of Ω. On the condition that k ≤ ℓ < k + ℓ ≤ |Ω|, we show that every ℓ-homogeneous transformation semigroup acting on Ω must be k-homogeneous. We report other variants of this result for Boolean semirings and affine/projective geometries. In general, any semigroup action on a poset gives rise to an automaton and we associate some sequences of integers with the phase space of this automaton. When this poset is a geometric lattice, we propose to investigate various possible regularity properties of these sequences, especially the so-called top-heavy property. In the course of this study, we are led to a conjecture about the injectivity of the incidence operator of a geometric lattice, generalizing a conjecture of Kung.
Highlights
1.1 Transformation and phase spaceLet Γ be a digraph, namely a pair consisting of its vertex set V(Γ) and arc set E(Γ) ⊆ V(Γ) × V(Γ)
The main purpose of this note is to propose a study of the possible regularity in the strong/weak shape of a semigroup acting on a valuated poset
The key lemma is Lemma 3.2, which gives us some information of the strong/weak shapes of a poset under some semigroup action, provided the semigroup consists of hereditary endomorphisms and that some linear map associated with the poset is injective
Summary
Let Γ be a digraph, namely a pair consisting of its vertex set V(Γ) and arc set E(Γ) ⊆ V(Γ) × V(Γ). The composition of maps provides an associative product on the set ΩΩ and turns it into a monoid, namely a semigroup with a multiplicative unit We call this monoid the full transformation monoid on Ω and denote it by T(Ω). If the transformation semigroup S is generated by a set G ⊆ ΩΩ, namely S consists of products of elements of G of positive length, we call (S, G) a deterministic automaton on Ω [67, §1]. For any set Ω, a subset of T(Ω) forms a permutation group on Ω whenever it is a transformation semigroup and each element has an inverse in it, namely it is a set of bijective transformations of Ω and is closed under compositions and taking inverses. Moving from group actions to semigroup actions is just to consider general deterministic automata instead of reversible ones
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have