Top‐down and bottom‐up control in an eelgrass–epiphyte system

Abstract

Nutrient supply and the presence of grazers can control primary producers in aquatic ecosystems, but the relative importance of bottom‐up and top‐down effects remains inconclusive. We conducted a mesocosm experiment and a field study to investigate the independent and interactive effects of nutrient enrichment and grazing on primary producers in an eelgrass bed Zostera marina. Nutrient treatments consisted of ambient or enriched (2× and 4× ambient) concentrations of inorganic nitrogen and phosphate. Grazer treatments consisted of presence or absence of field densities of the common isopod Idotea baltica. We found strong and interacting effects of nutrients and grazing on epiphytes. Epiphyte biomass and productivity were enhanced by nutrient enrichment and decreased in the presence of grazers. The absolute amount of epiphyte biomass consumed by grazers increased under high nutrient supply, and thus, nutrient effects were stronger in the absence of grazing. The effects of grazers and fertilisation on epiphyte composition were antagonistic: chain‐forming diatoms and filamentous algae profited from nutrient enrichment, but their proportions were reduced by grazing. Eelgrass growth was positively affected by grazing and by nutrient enrichment at moderate nutrient concentrations. High nutrient supply reduced eelgrass productivity compared to moderate nutrient conditions. The monthly measured field data showed a nitrogen limitation for epiphytes and eelgrass in summer, which may explain the positive effect of nutrient enrichment on both primary producers. Generally, the field data suggested the possibility of seasonally varying importance of bottom‐up and top‐down control on primary producers in this eelgrass system.