Toothcomb homology and toothcomb function in extant strepsirhines

Abstract

Contrary to some recent assertions, there are no persuasive ways for determining the homologies of indriid toothcomb teeth and the resulting dental formulas. Most of the presumably distinctive features of procumbent “canines” are also seen in incisors, and vice versa. Thus, there are at least three plausible dental formulas for indriid deciduous teeth and two for the permanent dentition. All formulas are compatible with the distribution of teeth in fossil strepsirhines. Similar arguments apply to strepsirhine toothcombs as a whole, but the absence of three-incisored ancestors in the fossil record strongly supports the conclusion that the dental formula of nonindriids is 2.1.3.3. for the lower dentition. There are also alternative interpretations of the original function of the toothcomb. Recent arguments which purport to demonstrate that the toothcomb evolved originally as a sap-feeding adaptation fail that purpose. The ontogeny of infant lemur behavior suggests that the original function involved grooming rather than feeding if the data are interpreted in a Haeckelian context.