Abstract
O bjective – The aim of this article is to illustrate the importance of a prompt evaluation of a foreign body aspiration (FBA). C ase Presentation – A 13-year old boy was admitted to hospital in 1981, one and a half month after a dental procedure of tooth extraction. The tooth was presumed to have been ingested during the procedure and the child was sent home. The symptoms presented immediately and were aggravating during the time. Before the admission to the hospital the child was examined by medical professionals on three occasions but only at hospital the FBA was suspected. During the first bronchoscopy, the foreign body had not been extracted, so the child was transferred to the referral centre where the tooth was successfully removed and he recovered. Conclusion – In the setting of dental procedure in paediatric population, the missing instrument, material or extracted tooth must be found or a foreign body aspiration and ingestion should be suspected until proven otherwise.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
