Abstract

Ideally, decisions regarding one’s health should be made after assessing the objective probabilities of relevant outcomes. Nevertheless, previous beliefs and emotional reactions also have a role in decision-making. Furthermore, the comprehension of probabilities is commonly affected by the presentation format, and by numeracy. This study aimed to assess the extent to which the influence of these factors might vary between different medical conditions. A sample of university students were presented with two health scenarios containing statistical information on the prevalence of breast cancer and hypertension either through icon arrays (N = 71) or natural frequencies (N = 72). They also received information regarding a preventive measure (mammogram/low-sodium diet) and the likelihood of a positive mammogram or a rich-sodium diet either when suffering or not suffering from the disease. Before seeing the data, participants rated the severity of the disease and the inconvenience of the preventive measure. After reading the health scenario, participants had to rate its difficulty, and how worrisome it was. They had also to rate the prior probability of suffering from this medical condition, and the posterior probability of it, provided a positive mammogram or a rich-sodium diet. Finally, they rated the extent to which they would recommend the preventive measures. All the rates used the same 1 (little)-8 (a great deal) scale. Participants’ numeracy was also assessed. The scenarios differed significantly in perceived severity and worry, with the cancer scenario obtaining higher scores. Importantly, regression analyses showed that the recommendations in the two health scenarios depended on different variables. A model taking into consideration severity and worry rates best explained decisions in the cancer scenario; in contrast, in the hypertension scenario the model that best explained the recommendations comprised both the posterior probability estimate and the severity rate. Neither numeracy nor presentation format affected recommendation but both affected difficulty, worrying and probability rates. We conclude that previous perceptions of the severity of a health condition modulate the use of probabilistic information for decision-making. The roles of presentation format and numeracy in enabling patients to understand statistical information are also discussed.

Highlights

  • Passing from a doctor-centered to a patient-centered model of health has led in the last decades to an increase in the interest devoted to informed consent and how to ensure that decisions are knowledgeable

  • When dealing with affect-rich situations such as deciding on medical treatments for ourselves or our loved ones, other factors seem to come into play

  • Our aim in this study was to investigate the role of previous beliefs and emotions in two medical situations differing in severity, i.e., in their negative consequences

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Passing from a doctor-centered to a patient-centered model of health has led in the last decades to an increase in the interest devoted to informed consent and how to ensure that decisions are knowledgeable. The probability and the subjective value of the outcome are usually assumed to be independent constructs, Harris et al (2009) showed that this was not always the case. They found a main effect of probability but, interestingly, estimation at each probability level was higher when the consequences of participants’ decisions were more severe. Harris et al attributed their effect to the fact that, in case of severe consequences, the costs associated with underestimating probability are high; individuals, inflate their estimations of the probability of occurrence as a preventive measure This would happen only when participants can make a decision based on these probabilities

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call