Abstract

For insurance companies in Europe, the introduction of Solvency II leads to a tightening of rules for solvency capital provision. In life insurance, this especially affects retirement products that contain a significant portion of longevity risk (for example conventional annuities). Insurance companies might react by price increases for those products, and, at the same time, might think of alternatives that shift longevity risk (at least partially) to policyholders. In the extreme case, this leads to so-called tontine products where the insurance company's role is merely administrative and longevity risk is shared within a pool of policyholders. From the policyholder's viewpoint, such products are, however, not desirable as they lead to a high uncertainty of retirement income at old ages. In this article, we alternatively suggest a so-called tonuity that combines the appealing features of tontine and conventional annuity. Until some fixed age (the switching time), a tonuity's payoff is tontine-like, afterwards the policyholder receives a secure payment of a (deferred) annuity. A tonuity is attractive for both the retiree (who benefits from a secure income at old ages) and the insurance company (whose capital requirements are reduced compared to conventional annuities). The tonuity is a possibility to offer tailor-made retirement products: using risk capital charges linked to Solvency II, we show that retirees with very low or very high risk aversion prefer a tontine or conventional annuity, respectively. Retirees with medium risk aversion, however, prefer a tonuity. In a utility-based framework, we therefore determine the optimal tonuity characterized by the critical switching time that maximizes the policyholder's lifetime utility.

Highlights

  • Recent increases in life expectancy and the steep decline of interest rates have led to improved awareness of the risks contained in retirement products

  • We show that the attractiveness of conventional annuities is decreased if policyholders are charged for the cost of required longevity risk capital

  • From the policyholder’s viewpoint, it might, neither be desirable to be fully insured against longevity risk nor to be fully prone to longevity risk

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Recent increases in life expectancy and the steep decline of interest rates have led to improved awareness of the risks contained in retirement products. From the policyholder’s viewpoint, it might, neither be desirable to be fully insured against longevity risk (and pay the resulting high risk capital charges) nor to be fully prone to longevity risk (and risk an uncertain retirement income, especially at old ages). In the remainder of this article, this new product is named “tonuity” To us, this product seems to be attractive as it combines the appealing features of tontine and annuity for insurers as well as policyholders: (1) Risk capital charges are significantly reduced.

TONTINES AND ANNUITIES
Payoff to policyholders
Net Premium
Risk capital charges
COMBINED PRODUCT
NUMERICAL II
CONCLUSION
Proof of Theorem 2
Findings
Proof of Theorem 3
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.