Abstract

The technique of transtympanic electrocochleography was initially developed as an objective hearing threshold test by Eggermont. Gibson et al. (1977) claimed that an enlarged direct current component of the action potential (AP) called the summating potential (SP) is an indication of endolymphatic hydrops, later confirmed by Coates who proposed an SP/AP ratio measure. This led to numerous publications using diagnostic ratios of 0.33–0.35. The insensitivity led to an eventual disenchantment with the test as a reliable objective test for Meniere's disease. It was further confused by audiologists employing remote canal or ear drum electrodes which give a response about one-fourth of the magnitude obtained by an electrode in contact with the cochlea. Subsequently Gibson stated that an SP/AP ratio of <0.5 is not diagnostic for hydrops. He then showed that a tone burst stimulus gave the test a significantly higher sensitivity and specificity, which has been supported by others. On MRI inner ear imaging with gadolinium hydrops can be seen, but the quality of images and what is seen may vary according to brand of scanner, settings, mode of gadolinium administration, and the possibility that gadolinium entry may favor the vestibule. Transtympanic tone burst electrocochleography is to date the simplest, cheapest and most sensitive technique for detecting cochlear endolymphatic hydrops to confirm a diagnosis of Meniere's disease.

Highlights

  • Electrocochleography (EcochG) is a method of directly recording electrical activity of the cochlea and the acoustic nerve in response to acoustic stimulation

  • The initial promise of a click response summating potential (SP)/action potential (AP) ratio as a sensitive test for endolymphatic hydrops has not been realized (Hornibrook et al., 2016). It can be measured by a ET electrode the responses are at least one quarter the magnitude of those obtained by a TT electrode

  • ET electrodes are significantly inferior for measuring tone burst responses

Read more

Summary

Jeremy Hornibrook *

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Christchurch Hospital, University of Canterbury and University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand Reviewed by: Brian Richard Earl, University of Cincinnati, United States Bryan Kevin Ward, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, United States Specialty section: This article was submitted to Auditory Cognitive Neuroscience, a section of the journal Frontiers in Neuroscience

Electrocochleography for the Diagnosis of Clinically Certain
INTRODUCTION
COCHLEAR MICROPHONIC
ACTION POTENTIAL
SUMMATING POTENTIAL
ELECTRODE PLACEMENT
MORE POSITIVE THAN
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call