Abstract
Centroid Sampling was terted on 20 logs of Pinus brutia (Pinus brutia Ten.) and 17 logs of Cedar (Cedrus libani A.Rich) all of which were measured in detail. The volume of each log was estimated using Huber's, Smalian's, Newton- Riecke's, Hossfeld's formulas and Centroid Sampling. These estimates were compared with “true” volume of each log which was determined by aggregating the volumes of measured short (10 cm) using Smalian's formula. According to the mean error of the Centroid estimates of the log volumes was not significant for Pinus brutia (Pinus brutia Ten.) and Cedar (Cedrus libani A.Rich) was less than those derived form Huber's, Smalian's, Newton-Riecke's, Hossfeld's formulas. Keywords: Centroid sampling, log volume, Taurus Cedar, Red Pine.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Turkish Journal of Forestry | Türkiye Ormancılık Dergisi
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
