Tomography versus computed tomography for assessing step off in intraarticular distal radial fractures.

Abstract

Computed tomography scans have supplanted conventional tomography for many applications and often are considered the imaging study of choice for assessing intraarticular distal radial fractures. Concern about cost containment in healthcare delivery prompts the question of whether the two studies provide comparable information and at what cost. Common intraarticular distal radial fractures were created in 12 lightly embalmed cadaveric specimens. The fractures were fixed with radiolucent Kirschner wires. Articular step off was measured with a caliper. Plain radiographs, computed tomography scans, and trispiral tomograms were obtained of each specimen. Maximal step off was measured blindly by two musculoskeletal radiologists and four hand surgeons. The radiographic measurements were compared with the actual step off and expressed as a positive or negative deviation from the actual value. There was no statistically significant difference between computed tomography scans and tomograms in predicting step off. In addition, the difference between actual and radiographic measurements was insignificant in tomogram readings and different in one of the computed tomography measurements. In the authors' institution, a tomogram costs $200, and a computed tomography scan costs $562. Trispiral tomography is more accurate and cost effective than computed tomography, and thus when available should be considered the imaging modality of choice for assessing articular step off in distal radius fractures.