Abstract

Cochlear disruptions induced by toluene were shown in the rat but not in the guinea pig. To better understand the differences between species, three investigations were carried out to study (1) the blood affinity and the pulmonary uptake of the solvent, (2) its clearance and (3) its urinary elimination in both species. The blood affinity of toluene was +44% higher in the rat than in the guinea pig (14.4 μg/g versus 10 μg/g). Similarly, the pulmonary uptake of toluene was approximately 46.5% more efficient in the rat than in the guinea pig (75.4 μg/g versus 40.3 μg/g) after 3 h inhalation of 1500 ppm toluene. Therefore, the physicochemical composition of the blood could explain the difference in the uptake performances between rats and guinea pigs. The clearance of the toluene showed that 10 min after an intravenous administration of 400 μL of vehicle containing 28 μL (43 mg kg −1) of toluene, the solvent concentration was approximately threefold higher in the rat than in the guinea pig blood. The last experiment was carried out to compare the concentrations of the urinary metabolites. The concentrations of o-cresol, hippuric and benzyl mercapturic acids measured in the urines were different before and after the toluene injection. These data give evidence for large differences of toluene uptake and metabolism between rat and guinea pig. Therefore, it seems reasonable to claim that guinea pigs cochleas are not susceptible to toluene as the blood burden of solvent does not reach the concentration required to induce permanent damages.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.