Abstract

BackgroundAs a further extension of smoke-free laws in indoor public places and workplaces, the Department of Housing and Urban Development’s declaration to propose a regulation that would make housing units smoke-free was inevitable. Of note is the challenge this regulation poses to current tenants of housing units who are active smokers. We aimed to assess the efficacy of a tobacco treatment clinic in public housing. The utilization of the clinic by tenants and tenants’ respective outcomes regarding smoking status were used to determine the intervention’s effectiveness.MethodsTobacco treatment clinics were held in two urban-based housing units for 1-year. The clinics provided on-site motivational interviewing and prescriptions for pharmacological agents if warranted. Outcomes collected include the tenants’ clinic attendance and 3- and 6-month self-reported smoking status.ResultsTwenty-nine tobacco treatment clinic sessions were implemented, recruiting 47 tenants to participate in smoking cessation. The mean age of the cohort was 53 ± 12.3 years old. Of the 47 tenants who participated, 21 (44.7%) attended three or more clinic sessions. At the 3-month mark, five (10.6%) tenants were identified to have quit smoking; at 6-months, 13 (27.7%) tenants had quit smoking. All 13 of the tenants who quit smoking at the end of 6-months attended three or more sessions.ConclusionAn on-site tobacco treatment clinic to provide strategies on smoking cessation was feasible. Efforts are warranted to ensure more frequent follow-ups for tenants aiming to quit smoking. While further resources should be allocated to help tenants comply with smoke-free housing units’ regulations, we believe an on-site tobacco treatment clinic is impactful.

Highlights

  • IntroductionThe success of prior tobacco control policies indicates that such a proposal may reduce overall tobacco use, resulting in positive health outcomes and consequent medical cost savings of well over 200 million United States dollars [3,4,5]

  • As a further extension of smoke-free laws in indoor public places and workplaces, the Department of Housing and Urban Development’s declaration to propose a regulation that would make housing units smoke-free was inevitable

  • Prohibiting smoking in housing units could result in substantial cost savings by reducing cigarette smokerelated damage to the buildings [2, 3]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The success of prior tobacco control policies indicates that such a proposal may reduce overall tobacco use, resulting in positive health outcomes and consequent medical cost savings of well over 200 million United States dollars [3,4,5]. Despite these clear potential benefits both medical and economic – the burden that a smoking ban in public housing places on active smokers should not go unrecognized. Novel strategies are necessary to reach actively smoking tenants living in these housing units to providing educational insight into tobacco dependence management and, complete cessation

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call