Abstract
A variety of linguistic properties which are characteristic of correct as well as erroneous utterances of normal speakers give evidence against the view that language can be sufficiently described as “sequential activity”. Furthermore, the structure of many aphasic errors makes it most plausible that the linguistic code of a particular language is affected in aphasia in addition to motor sequencing. Thus, the claim that aphasia and apraxia are simply different manifestations of an impairment of motor sequencing must be refuted.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
