Abstract
We would like to draw attention to some incorrect suggestions put forward by De Sutter and Dhont (1) in their recent report. In this study, a retrospective analysis of young poor responders was carried out, in which they were compared with young normal responders. The authors came to the conclusion that young poor responders cannot be considered ovarian-aged patients because pregnancy rates in young poor and normal responders do not differ if embryos of similar quality are transferred. They claim that in young poor responders the outcome of IVF is determined by the number of oocytes and hence by the probability of obtaining one or two good-quality embryos. They conclude thereby that oocyte quantity is the predominant problem in those young poor responders and not oocyte quality.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
