Abstract
Abstract In the September issue of this journal, Professor Jan Laitos wrote an article about the pending Nevada Supreme Court case of County of Clark u. Hsu. Although the article appears to present for examination both sides of a pending issue, it principally argues for the County's position, concluding that the County ought to prevail. This is a response from the other side, showing why the County is constitutionally required to pay for what it took, and why Professor Laitos' analysis is faulty.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
