To Lump or To Split: Does Strain Lineage for Clostridioides difficile Matter?

Abstract

Since 2001, numerous descriptive ecological studies of Clostridioides difficile infections (CDI) have identified a single lineage (BI/NAP1/027) associated with the epidemics of CDI, increased severity of CDI, and increased likelihood of incident CDI to become recurrent. Establishing causality between the clinical severity and outcomes for CDI and the lineages of the infecting strains, however, has proved elusive, with many conflicting results in previous observational studies. In this issue of the Journal of Clinical Microbiology, J. R. Garneau, C. N. Abou Chakra, L.-C. Fortier, A.-C. Labbé, et al. (J Clin Microbiol 57:e01724-18, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01724-18) performed multilocus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis (MLVA) on 450 isolates from epidemic strain CDI arising in 10 Canadian centers during a previously well-described epidemic to assess the hypothesis that subpopulations of this lineage are associated with adverse clinical outcomes. The authors' key finding, however, was that MLVA genotyping grouped infections closely with associated hospital centers; CDI severity was not associated with any particular sublineage by MLVA. While the study does not support any causal inferences about strain-specific virulence of CDI, it does highlight the power of MLVA, a genotyping tool that remains valuable in tracking the geospatial transmission dynamics of CDI.