Abstract
In the face of mounting protectionist sentiments, aggravated further due to COVID-19, India is redefining its trade policy. This is evident from the fact that India has decided to not join the mega-trade deal, Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP), giving in to the concern of massive trade deficit with China and other countries of the Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN). This stance is complete opposite to India’s ‘Look East Policy’. Instead, India is looking for closer trade ties with the United States (US) and the European Union (EU). In this context, this article evaluates the performance of India’s trade, in general, as well as with its Eastern (ASEAN, China, RCEP) and Western partners (US and EU), on its industrial sector employment. Employment is a better measure than trade deficit because employment gives a picture of both growth and distributional aspects of trade effects. Using a dynamic econometric model in a panel framework, it is found that, in general, while export intensity had favourable impact, import penetration had a detrimental impact on industrial sector employment during 1996–1997 to 2016–2017. Region wise analysis shows that trade with ASEAN has been employment enhancing while that with China had a negative impact on employment. On the East versus West looking trade policy debate, analysis suggests that the long run impact of exports, to both the West (EU plus USA) and the East (RCEP) partners, on employment is positive. Also, contrary to the mainstream view, the negative effects of imports, on industrial sector employment, from RCEP appears to be insignificant than that associated with imports from the EU plus USA. Thus, trade agreements with the EU and the US cannot be a substitute for dis-engaging with the resilient Eastern partners. Rather, India should strengthen its trade prospects with its East Asian partners and simultaneously look for export market in the West to enhance its employment creation.
Highlights
One of the unprecedented consequences of COVID-19 pandemic is the fanning of protectionist sentiments across that world, the rising flames of which were visible in the wake of United States (US)–China trade war, attack on World Trade Organisation, etc
The results indicate that while import penetration has a negative and significant impact on industrial sector employment in India in the long run, export intensity has a positive and significant impact on employment in the long run
Both import penetration and export intensity are negatively related to employment
Summary
One of the unprecedented consequences of COVID-19 pandemic is the fanning of protectionist sentiments across that world, the rising flames of which were visible in the wake of US–China trade war, attack on World Trade Organisation, etc. In such times, India’s commitment to steady and progressive trade liberalisation (since 1991) is being tested. The precipitating factor for such an inward-looking policy stance, especially towards the Asian countries, is the view that trade agreements, as a result of India’s Look East Policy, have benefited only the partner countries—partner countries have successfully reduced their import –export ratio, while India’s exports to these countries have remained muted (Saraswat et al, 2018). Is India looking ‘West’? Will this dealignment from the East be beneficial? What should be India’s trade policy, going forward, given the current global trade scenario?
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
