Abstract

This review considers factors affecting the flight capacity of carabid beetles and the implications of flight for carabids. Studies from the Dutch polders in particular show that young populations of carabids consist predominantly of macropterous species and macropterous individuals of wing-dimorphic species. Also populations of wing-dimorphic carabid species at the periphery of their geographical range contain high proportions of macropterous individuals. However, studies from Baltic archipelagos show that older populations of even highly isolated island habitats contain considerable proportions of brachypterous species and individuals. This suggests that macroptery is primarily an adaptation for dispersal and that there exists a mechanism for subsequently reducing the ratio of macropterous to brachypterous species under stable conditions, due to the competitive advantage of brachyptery. Populations in isolated habitats, such as islands and mountains, have high proportions of brachypterous species. Many macropterous species do not possess functional flight muscles. Species of unstable habitats, such as tree canopies and wet habitats, are mostly macropterous. Brachypterous species tend to disappear from disturbed habitats. There is uncertainty regarding the extent to which carabid dispersal is directed and how much passive. Both Den Boer and Lindroth recognized that mostly macropterous individuals of macropterous and wing-dimorphic species disperse and found new populations, after which brachyptery tends to rapidly appear and proliferate in the newly founded population. It is most likely that the allele for brachyptery would arrive via the dispersal of gravid females which had mated with brachypterous males prior to emigration. Whilst many studies consider wing morphology traits of carabid beetles to be species-specific and permanent, a number of studies have shown that the oogenesis flight syndrome, whereby females undertake migration and subsequently lose their flight muscles by histolysis before eventually regenerating them after reproducing, has been reported for a growing number of carabid species. Wing morphology of carabid beetles clearly offers strong potential for the study of population dynamics. This field of study flourished during the 1940's to the late 1980's. Whilst a considerable amount of valuable research has been performed and published, the topic clearly holds considerable potential for future study.

Highlights

  • This review considers factors affecting the flight capacity of carabid beetles and the implications of flight for carabids

  • My own studies of data on wing-length within species (Venn, 2007) and those of Desender (1989a) suggest that (1) the term wing-polymorphic is more appropriate than dimorphic as a general term for describing species containing macropterous and brachypterous individuals, though dimorphic is appropriate for any species that can be demonstrated as constantly producing two cohorts, without individuals of intermediate wing-length and (2) even if analysis of large datasets suggests a species is monomorphic, this does not exclude the possibility of subsequently generating individuals of an alternative wing morphology

  • Lindroth studied the phenomenon of wing morphology extensively, and classified the carabid species described in his regional keys as macropterous, brachypterous or dimorphic (Lindroth, 1974, 1985, 1986)

Read more

Summary

WING MORPHOLOGY IN CARABID BEETLES

Carabid beetles are one of a number of insect taxa that exhibit variable patterns of wing morphology, as a result of which there are considerable differences in the dispersal potential of different species and even between different populations and individuals within the same species. My own studies of data on wing-length within species (Venn, 2007) and those of Desender (1989a) suggest that (1) the term wing-polymorphic is more appropriate than dimorphic as a general term for describing species containing macropterous and brachypterous individuals, though dimorphic is appropriate for any species that can be demonstrated as constantly producing two cohorts, without individuals of intermediate wing-length and (2) even if analysis of large datasets suggests a species is monomorphic, this does not exclude the possibility of subsequently generating individuals of an alternative wing morphology The second of these conclusions clearly has implications for the identification of species using keys, where a number of similar species are distinguished from each other primarily according to wing morphology. His study included biometric analysis of more than 300 species of carabid beetle indigenous to Belgium, and revealed that species associated with temporal habitats tended to have high dispersal power in terms of wing-length and possession of functional flight muscles. Desender (1989b) did not succeed in demonstrating any selective advantages of reduced wing development, though he concurred with the suggestion of Lindroth (1945, 1946, 1949) that these traits were often characteristic of old, stable populations

THE INHERITANCE OF WING MORPHOLOGY
THE INFLUENCE OF HABITAT ON WING MORPHOLOGY
THE INFLUENCE OF DISTURBANCE
FLIGHT MUSCLES
FLIGHT ACTIVITY
DISPERSAL
BIOGEOGRAPHY
POPULATION DYNAMICS
10. POST-GLACIAL COLONIZATION OF SCANDINAVIA BY CARABID BEETLES
11. SEASONAL VARIATION IN FLIGHT CAPACITY – OOGENESIS-FLIGHT
12. ESTIMATING FLIGHT-CAPACITY
13. ORIENTATION AND STIMULATION OF CARABID FLIGHT
Findings
14. SYNTHESIS
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call