Abstract

PurposeTo compare the efficacy of 0.1 % w/w Liposomal Amphotericin-B gel with 10 % w/w Povidone-Iodine and saline nasal douching in preventing revision surgery in patients with CAM. Study designMulti-arm, parallel randomized control trial. Study settingThe trial was conducted in the Department of ENT, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) Bhubaneswar. MethodsParticipants: Microbiologically and histologically proven cases of mucormycosis who underwent surgical debridement were included in the study.Interventions: Postoperatively, patients were randomized into three groups based on the type of topical intervention received, in the form of Lipid-based Amphotericin B gel, povidone‑iodine ointment or saline nasal douching.Outcome: Requirement of revision surgery in postoperative cases of CAM.Randomization: Participants were allotted to one of the three arms by block randomization.Blinding: Single-blinded trial. ResultsNumbers randomized: 15 participants were randomized to each group.Recruitment: Completed recruiting.Numbers analyzed: 15 participants were analyzed in each group.Outcomes: Control arm's risk of revision surgery was 4.50 (95 % CI: 1.16–17.44) times than Lipid-based Amphotericin B gel arm and 1.50 (95 % CI: 0.71–3.16) times that of the Povidone- Iodine arm. The difference was statistically significant (p = 0.02) for Amphotericin but not for Povidone-Iodine. ConclusionsTopical Amphotericin-B gel application in the postoperative cavity can decrease the need for revision surgery and help in early recovery. Trial registrationCTRI/2021/10/037257. Clinical Trials Registry of India.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call