To Determine a Quality from Visum ET Repertum Needs a Living Victim in Rsud Posea Since 1st January 2015 Till 31st December 2018

Asan Petrus

doi:10.15520/jcmro.v3i09.335

Abstract

Background: Visum et repertum (VeR) as evidence plays a role in the process ofproving a criminal case and is expected to provide sufficient information for lawenforcers, especially judges in making court decisions, for this purpose a goodquality VeR is needed.Methods: This study is an observational study with a descriptive analyticapproach to post mortem data for injuries of living victims in Porsea RegionalHospital for the period January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2018, using a scoringtool from Herkutanto to 13 variables in visum et repertum of injuries to livingvictims. . The sample was selected by total sampling method.Results: The total number of cases examined by doctors as evidenced by the VeRletter was 17 cases. The quality of the VeR injury to the preliminary section is100% (the quality is good). The quality of the VeR injury in the news section is51.56% (moderate quality). The quality of the VeR injury to the conclusion is45.5% (the quality is not good). The quality of the VER of the injuries in generalwas 51.54% (moderate quality).Conclusion: Based on the results of this study, the post-mortem made by doctorsat Porsea Hospital is not good, it is still in the moderate category, especially thenews and conclusions section, this is in accordance with what is stated in theRegulation of the Indonesian Medical Council No. 11 of 2012 and the results ofprevious studies

Highlights

Nowadays, we hear a lot and even we can see crime scenes that are involving material things but people’s life
The value of the quality of Conclusion part = (0.91 x 8/16) x 100% = 45.5% Based on the results of this study conducted on the Visum et repertum (VeR) of injured life victims in Porsea Regional Hospital from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2018 it was found that the conclusion of the quality of VeR was 45.5%, which means that the quality was not good enough
4 CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS: Based on research results obtained from Visum et Repertum data in Porsea Regional Hospital January 1, 2015 until December 31, 2018, it can be concluded: a

Summary

Introduction

We hear a lot and even we can see crime scenes (cases) that are involving material things but people’s life. Based on Medical Council Regulation in Indonesia no 11 year of 2012 about the Standart Compentency doctor in Indonesia (SCDI) page 29 about the related issues of doctor’s profession point 28 that stated a doctor refused and / or not make Visum et repertum according to scientific starndars that should be compulsory This regulation is a feedback of general description of health services problem in the field, especially in services to help patient to enforce the law that related to crime they experienced. Visum et repertum (VeR) as evidence plays a role in the process of proving a criminal case and is expected to provide sufficient information for law enforcers, especially judges in making court decisions, for this purpose a good quality VeR is needed.

Methods

Results

Conclusion