Abstract

BackgroundPleural effusion indicates an imbalance between pleural fluid formation and removal. Classified into exudative and transudative, with common symptoms of dry cough, dyspnea and pleuritic chest pain. Confirmed etiology has to be established for effective treatment. ObjectiveCorrelate clinical and biochemical profile of various etiologies of pleural effusion. Materials & methodsRetrospective observational study of 2 years in the department of respiratory medicine, GMC Bhopal on 280 cases of pleural effusion. ResultsMost common etiology was tubercular 202 (72.4%) followed by malignant in 36 (12.8%). With respect to tubercular, malignant pleural effusion has relative risk (RR) of 0.138 (p value < 0.05) in the age group of 51–60 years, which is statistically significant. Patients of tuberculosis complained of fever 158 (78.2%) whereas with malignancy complained of chest pain 16 (44.4%) followed by hemoptysis 12 (33.3%). For hemoptysis, with respect to tubercular, malignant effusion has RR of 5.68 (p value < 0.05) which is significant. History of smoking was significant in malignant effusion with RR of 2.57 (p value < 0.05) as compared to tubercular. Pleural fluid ADA was >70 in 83.7% in tubercular effusion, glucose was <60 mg/dl in 79% tubercular, malignant and bacteriological cause, LDH was >1000 in 88.4% in bacteriological and 72.3% in malignant effusion. ConclusionLack of tools for confirming diagnosis leads to diagnostic dilemma and delay in treatment initiation, leading to deterioration and untoward fatality in some cases. Our goal is early diagnosis by correlating clinical symptoms with biochemical profile and help initiate rapid treatment.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call