Abstract

Objectives Insertion of laryngeal mask airway has been facilitated by using a variety of induction agents and their combinations with minimal side effects. The current prospective study is a randomized, double-blind study conducted using induction agents, namely, propofol and its equipotent dose of thiopentone, for laryngeal mask airway insertion, and to compare their side effects in patients undergoing minor surgeries requiring general anaesthesia. Methods This prospective study was carried out at the Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Department of Gauhati Medical College and Hospital (GMCH), Assam, India. The randomized, double-blinded study comprised 80 patients aged 18 to 60 years undergoing minor surgeries (≤45 minutes) under general anaesthesia fitting into the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I and II and Mallampati score (MPS) 1 and 2. The participants were randomly divided into two groups in a 1:1 ratio. Group A (n= 40) received propofol(2.5 mg/kg), while group B (n = 40) received thiopentone(5 mg/kg) injections for induction of anaesthesia. Pre-medication with midazolam (0.04 mg/kg)injectionand fentanyl (1.5 mcg/kg) injectionwas provided to patients in both groups. Post-laryngeal mask airway insertion, parameters like conditions for insertion, time taken for laryngeal mask airway insertion, overall response,and haemodynamic parameters were recorded. The data analysis was executed using equivalence tests considering a two-sided p< 0.05 as significant. Results Group Ahad a higher and statistically significant ease of insertion (p = 0.029). The mean insertion time was notably different between the two groups (p < 0.001). The difference in the overall response to insertion showed no statistical significance in the two groups. Statistically, a significant difference was found in falls in heart rate and various blood pressure levels between the groups (p < 0.001). Conclusion Propofol at a rate of 2.5 mg/kg was found to be superior to thiopentone at a rate of 5 mg/kg as far as suppression of upper airway reflexes in laryngeal mask airway insertion.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call