Abstract
Based on case studies, we discuss the extent to which genome-wide association studies (GWAS) are affected by outlier plants, i.e. those deviating from the expected distribution on a multi-criteria basis. Using a raw dataset consisting of daily measurements of leaf area, biomass, and plant height for thousands of plants, we tested three different cleaning methods for their effects on genetic analyses. No-cleaning resulted in the highest number of dubious quantitative trait loci, especially at loci with highly unbalanced allelic frequencies. A trade-off was identified between the risk of false-positives (with no-cleaning and/or a low threshold for minor allele frequency) and the risk of missing interesting rare alleles. Cleaning can lower the risk of the latter by making it possible to choose a higher threshold in GWAS.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
