Abstract

In this article, the authors experiment with an interdisicplinary, partly empirical investigation into the reception of a community-based theatre production created by three generations of Turkish migrants in the Netherlands. Although community arts has been experiencing a boom of sorts in the Netherlands and local funding agents increasingly call for evidence, very little empirical research has been done in the low countries so far. Prompted by the assumption that community-based theatre has a stronger effect on spectators who are peers of participant-performers than on relative outsiders, the researchers explore the possibilities and drawbacks of two different kinds of measuring reception of this particular community play. In the first, one of the researchers returned to respondents one year after they first saw the play to verify what impact, if any, still remains. In the second, another more psychologically inclined researcher attempted to find out how Turkish and non-Turkish spectators identified differently with particular characters in the play. These combined investigations lead the authors to conclude that the play was relatively effective in causing (inter-)cultural identification processes and sustained (inter-)cultural learning and that in all this there was a marked difference between Turkish and non-Turkish audiences. They also realise their approach is far from fool proof and call for further fine-tuning instruments for reliably measuring reception and participation in community arts projects.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call