Abstract
Strategic alliance partner selection is a complex process, where trade-off decisions on prospective partners’ attributes must be made. This paper uses the context of environmental reputation asymmetry to explore trade-off dynamics, scarcely dealt with in the literature. More specifically, I examine how CEOs (the main decision makers) reason on whether to decide to ally with a lower-reputation partner, and facilitating factors. Through a multiple-case approach, I find that initiating firms to alliances anticipate changes in partner firms’ reputations. The prospective partner’s propensity to improve is introduced as a core construct; it is proposed to significantly affect the focal firm’s trade-off willingness in the alliance formation situation. My data also reveal some determinants and dynamics in contrast with the ‘learning race’ perspective, suggesting that firms underutilize alliances as a means to enhance their environmental performance at lower cost.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.