Abstract
ABSTRACT Recent debates on the operation of the World Trade Organization’s dispute resolution mechanism have focused primarily on the appellate body. We argue that this neglects the first-order issue confronting the rules-based trading system: sustaining the principle of depoliticized conflict resolution that is reflected in the negative consensus rule for the adoption of dispute settlement findings. Improving the quality of the work of panels by appointing a roster of full-time professional adjudicators, complemented by reforms to World Trade Organization working practices that reduce incentives to resort to formal dispute settlement, can resolve the main issues that led to the appellate body crisis. Effective, coherent, and consistent World Trade Organization dispute resolution need not include an appellate body. An appropriately redesigned single-stage process can serve just as well, if not better.
Highlights
The quest by Uruguay Round negotiators when they crafted what became the WTO DSU (Dispute Settlement Understanding) was to design an effective system to resolve trade disputes
We argue that the goals and interests of WTO members, as reflected in the substance of the rules negotiated in the Uruguay Round and the institutional arrangements put in place to implement the various agreements and monitor trade policies, can only be served if negative consensus for adoption of rulings is maintained
In Article 17.6 of the DSU, they pointed in the direction of de facto precedential value of Appellate Body (AB) reports, when stating that: An appeal shall be limited to issues of law covered in the panel report and legal interpretations developed by the panel
Summary
The quest by Uruguay Round negotiators when they crafted what became the WTO DSU (Dispute Settlement Understanding) was to design an effective system to resolve trade disputes The mechanism they crafted, the means to achieve this end, had two fundamental components: (i) a two-instance adjudication regime; and (ii) a negative consensus decision-making rule that made it impossible for any of the parties to a dispute to block the formation of a dispute settlement panel or the adoption of a ruling by the adjudicators.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
