Abstract
This article examines several facets of employment law history with the intention of fortifying Professor Cary Franklin's thesis in her April 2012 article in the Harvard Law Review that courts have inappropriately confined Title VII's reach, in derogation of women's interests, by reference to an anticlassificationist metric. Examination of these additional items of employment law history demonstrates more fully that the Supreme Court's reliance on the so-called traditional concept of sex discrimination is simply a canard. This article thus offers a friendly amendment to Professor Franklin's scholarship in hopes of elevating the prohibition against sex discrimination from second-tier status to its rightful place in our legal system.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
